There are really no such things as luck. The word we are looking for is probability. There are certain probabilities associated with poker, and they are influenced by skill.
https://www.pokernews.com/news/2025/03/salman-behbehani-poker-drug-conviction-48226.htm
Do you think he will serve any time, based on the fact he's wealthy (wealthy even before poker)? Will he keep his money? Did he really need the money from his hobby anyway, lol?
https://www.pokernews.com/news/2025/04/robinpoker-the-time-i-won-nearly-seven-thousand-wpt-global-48258.htm
What can we learn from this? Who has heard of this guy? Well, I'm wondering if his wins are only balancing out equal or more loses.
It boggles my mind how these brainiacs use math to beat Vegas etc.. But even if you could do that, you'd have to back away sometimes, because too much winning angers the house.
https://www.poker.org/latest-news/taylor-hart-endures-epic-tank-in-main-event-win-at-wsopc-turning-stone-aeBwZ9g9RffD/
Who has heard of this? Does this inspire you? What is a tank? I'm thinking it's where things seem like nothing is going on.
I think this lady below would say otherwise:
https://www.poker.org/latest-news/power-routine-whats-going-on-in-nikkis-red-bull-video-aLJ1x8m8mJoT/
Has anyone heard of her? What do you think of her playing and other contributions to poker culture?
https://www.poker.org/poker-strategy/pro-tips-with-andrew-moreno-evolve-or-die-off-atsfE8K9ZJRi/
Anyone like his tips? Who would like to implement them? How has implemented them? What might be some criticism of his strategy?
https://www.poker.org/latest-news/theyre-evicting-us-only-friends-podcast-announces-likely-end-of-show-aEoOC5l9oz6K/
Has anyone seen this show? How did you like it? Is anyone upset this show is going off-the-air?
I enjoy watching local news on TV, but besides that I generally find it boring, even assuming I have time to watch it.
And I also find classic shows (The Twilight Zone, Star Trek, ALF, Sanford and Son etc.) and those post-2005 cable dramas and comedies (Eastbound and Down, Vice Principals...
Honestly, I've never tried real poker. I've only played video poker. I was exposed to it a lot on the island of Saipan. They had video poker rooms everywhere.
Poker is not a physical game, so I don't think differences in gender mean anything at all. Well, some sexist men might claim that men and women's brains are different. It's like when they say women can't drive a car or vote.
No matter the probability regarding other things, a large bankroll is probably the most important thing. Who else would agree? Why might it be more important?
I think if you're going to get into poker you gotta man up (or woman up) and take things like an adult. You can't complain about whatever is unfair. It reminds me of that scene on "White Men Can't Jump" where Woody Harrellson says "Under no circumstances do you ask for the money back", lol.
What is harder? What do you feel is more fun? Have you tried both or one or the other? How would you compare them? How would you compare poker machines, poker video games, and real poker to each other?
I don't think learning video poker is hard. However, learning how to be some expert player would be hard, and on top of that, you need a large bankroll.
Anyway, who has tried books on poker strategy? Has anyone tried something like "Poker for Dummies" (I don't know what the real name would be.)?
I'm not doing video poker now and I haven't done it since probably 2007, at the least. I haven't even played any video game versions. Well, it was becoming a problem as I wasn't winning, so it was just foolish.
I've only done video poker. I don't think I've ever gotten a royal flush, but I have seen someone else do it. He (my companion) got a royal flush on some machine in Saipan (a pacific island), but the bet was only 25 cents, so it didn't mean much, lol.