Grinding Microstakes vs Taking Shots, Which Is Better?

Welcome to Poker Community Forums!

Welcome to PCF, the online poker forums. Grind your way to the top of the leaderboards on StockPoker, and sharpen your strategy alongside the community. Earn badges by finishing in the top 3 on the PCF/StockPoker leaderboard, and Shark Tank leaderboard. Visit the leaderboard pages to learn how to qualify for the monthly leaderboard freerolls.

Join PCF! Login
I think it’s better to grind micro stakes and move up as your bankroll grows. That said, I do like to reward myself occasionally by taking a shot at a bigger buy-in when I’ve been running well.

Which do you think is better, grinding micro stakes or taking shots at bigger buy-ins?
 
I believe grinding microstakes is usually the better foundation. I think taking shots is a controlled way to accelerate progress.
Grinding gives you volume, experience, and stability. You learn patterns, build discipline, and grow your bankroll without high pressure.
 
All this “take shot” talk is sweet until variance slaps you. I used to feel like king anytime I win, next thing I would jump stake and boom, the story changed. Now I just dey grind micros slow and steady. It's boring sometimes but at least my bankroll is intact.
 
Ibthunk this depends on your gut feeling. Grinding microstakes is boring but safe. Taking shots can pay off, but one bad run hurts. I'd say grind until you've got extra buy-ins you don't care about losing, then take a smart shot.
 
Join Poker Community (PCF) on Discord! lbrew1 streams StockPoker on Twitch!

Latest profile posts

mischievous CHECKRAISER mischievous wrote on CHECKRAISER's profile.
Hiya i’m just curious have you always had the handle CheckRaiser?
I used to play with a player named Checkraise before Black Friday my handle then was offrdmom (off road mom)
Beers and Poker LFG!
Mini mental break from playing sort of. Gla today

Members online

PCF Bankroll Starter $25 Freebuy on Stock Poker
Back
Top