Should We Add Player Staking to PPC?

[Bawse]

One of the features I'd like to implement on PlayPoker.community is zero-risk player staking for backers.

If a player cashes in a tournament they were staked for, the backers would automatically be credited with their agreed-upon share of the winnings.

Horses could set their staking terms before requesting a stake, while backers could openly browse and choose which players they want to support.

Thoughts? I know ACR has a staking system, although it was implemented after I stopped playing there, so I never got a chance to test it myself.

 

[mischievous]

One of the features I'd like to implement on PlayPoker.community is zero-risk player staking for backers.

If a player cashes in a tournament they were staked for, the backers would automatically be credited with their agreed-upon share of the winnings.

Horses could set their staking terms before requesting a stake, while backers could openly browse and choose which players they want to support.

Thoughts? I know ACR has a staking system, although it was implemented after I stopped playing there, so I never got a chance to test it myself.

This I definitely would be interested in especially with the no risk for the bankers. In the old days, there was one Site don’t remember the name of it, but It was a nice addition when the cashed came rolling in.
I recently found one player that I’ve staked on several different sites. Problem is there’s been no return.
What makes the issue even more complex is when the horse decides to play against his own banker, as if trying to double up on his already credited account.Smdh

 

[Bawse]

This I definitely would be interested in especially with the no risk for the bankers. In the old days, there was one Site don’t remember the name of it, but It was a nice addition when the cashed came rolling in.
I recently found one player that I’ve staked on several different sites. Problem is there’s been no return.
What makes the issue even more complex is when the horse decides to play against his own banker, as if trying to double up on his already credited account.Smdh

The issue with horses is that not all players perform at their best when they have a backer.

 

[mischievous]

The issue with horses is that not all players perform at their best when they have a backer.

Seriously…. That never crossed my mind.
Thank you for mentioning it now. I can better track it. I had originally thought it was because this particular stud doesn’t accept a loss. I know it’s a tilt factor. It’s just trying to get him to control it.
The main issue young players these days have a total different concept of the game lol