- Messages
- 1,745
- Poker Coins
- 15,709.95
- StockPoker Screen Name
- BawseGrind
- DarkSidePoker Screen Name
- Bawse
I was talking with another member, and this discussion came up. I think if you can lure a player to calling with the worst hand, you should always try to get the most value. My mindset is always play to win, outcome of hands don't matter to me, if I'm all in with a dominating hand.
Ideally you don't want to be involved in big pots without the nuts as your goal is to survive until the end. Tournaments are a marathon, you can't win a tournament with one hand. I'm not a fan of risking my tournament life on coinflip situations, but sometimes I do like being the aggressor with small pairs, especially when the blinds get high.
How often do you think players should raise all in with the best hand in tourneys for value?
Ideally you don't want to be involved in big pots without the nuts as your goal is to survive until the end. Tournaments are a marathon, you can't win a tournament with one hand. I'm not a fan of risking my tournament life on coinflip situations, but sometimes I do like being the aggressor with small pairs, especially when the blinds get high.
How often do you think players should raise all in with the best hand in tourneys for value?