Trusting Your Reads vs. Following Theory

Welcome to Poker Community Forums!

Welcome to PCF, the online poker forums. Grind your way to the top of the leaderboards on StockPoker, and sharpen your strategy alongside the community. Earn badges by finishing in the top 3 on the PCF/StockPoker leaderboard, and Shark Tank leaderboard. Visit the leaderboard pages to learn how to qualify for the monthly leaderboard freerolls.

Join PCF! Login
  • PCF June Finals ($100 Freeroll)July 12th at 8:00 PM EST
    Shark Tank June Finals ($100 Freebuy)TBA
    » Qualified Players
I try to follow theory, I also trust my reads, however, when theory and my reads conflict, I always go with my reads. It is easier to trust myself than a theory based on some other people's perception.
 
The theory comes first for me. Reads are useful, but emotions can gets in the way and disguise themselves as reads sometimes. I've seen this happen to so many players
 
I try to use theory as my foundation, but I won't ignore a strong read just because it doesn't fit perfectly. If I've seen enough from a player to trust my read, I'm comfortable adjusting. The tricky part is knowing when it's a real read and when it's just a guess.
 
I'd trust theory. Instincts can be useful, especially against familiar opponents, but they're also influenced by emotion and recent results. I prefer to use theory as my foundation and only let instincts guide me when there's a good reason to deviate.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest profile posts

Apologies for being absent. Been moving house, then World Cup!

Anyways I'm here now. I have a brand new strategy article coming to the page tonight!

If you ever wanted to learn some poker math, and didn't get around to it, I got you! Watch this space!
Good luck in the home games tonight
I am taking a mental break from poker and playing Palworld. I will catch up on PCF and leaderboards tomorrow

834.jpg

Members online

Back
Top